Having looked at the peer assessment that I received from Charlotte Hannah, I can determine areas of concern and areas that I excel in. For example, I can see that the she has rated the variety of shot distances 1 out of 4 which is not good and this definitely needs to be changed in order to gain higher marks. Although this is a bad mark, it is not that concerning to me, as we only had 2 sides of our DigiPak done, and we knew our ideas contained different shot ranges, so in that respect we knew we could add to our DigiPak, changing the views of our peers.
However what I was pleased with was the level 4 for framing a shot. This showed that our camera skills and tripod skills were good, as the things included within the picture were fit to purpose and were all relevant. The angles that we used for example of the wall, where we decided to take it at an angle, so it looks like it is straying further out. We then added text on top of this panel, and also made the text get smaller as it goes along, and this was to make it fit the purpose of the angled shot.
The majority of levels we got as a group were 3 and 4, and this was due to unfinished products. Although the grades we recieved were not brilliant Charlotte did say it had the potential to be a level 4 in the majority of areas.
WWW: Ryan's group has shown great progress on the work they have completed so far on their digipacks.
ReplyDeletethey have used photoshop really well to edit their cd covers and show great skill and effort.
EBI: they could complete the other pages,